Oprogramowanie do sprawozdawczości w ramach filaru III Wypłacalności II

Synthetic Slovak Q3 2026 demonstration. EIOPA 2.8.2-hotfix QRS. AI-generated English narration. EIOPA XBRL export only; no national XML export, supervisory submission or authority acceptance is demonstrated. Let’s follow one reporting cycle, using synthetic Slovak data. We start with an Excel portfolio. The import preview shows what will change, using a mapping that’s already approved. After checking the preview, we apply it to the filing. Now we run validation. Here, the total assets figure doesn’t agree with the underlying detail. Instead of searching through spreadsheets, we can follow the finding back to the reported value. We correct that total to thirty million euros and run validation again. The related errors clear. A price warning remains, and that needs a separate review decision. Before sending the filing for review, we attach the supporting note. In this example, ten thousand units at the recorded price give a value one hundred euros below the reported amount. The note explains that difference. We submit this filing revision for an independent reviewer to decide whether that warning is acceptable. The reviewer can see the finding, the evidence and the proposed explanation together. For this synthetic example, they accept the one hundred euro difference for this filing revision. That’s a waiver, not a passed validation rule. The decision stays recorded with the filing. Once the reviewer approves and locks it, the preparer can’t quietly change the approved values. Finally, we export the approved filing as EIOPA XBRL. This is a local export, not a submission to a supervisor, and it doesn’t demonstrate Slovak national XML. That’s the workflow: bring in source data, resolve findings, review independently and export the approved result. Request a guided evaluation, and we’ll first confirm whether your reporting scope fits.