Reference
Validation-category reference
Interpret structural, data-quality, cross-template, taxonomy, and jurisdiction findings.
Structural and required-data findings
Identify missing facts, invalid types, unusable contexts, or required reporting structures. Check applicability and source completeness first.
In-table findings
Compare values within one template, such as totals, signs, ranges, or mutually constrained cells.
Cross-template findings
Compare facts across selected templates. A correction can belong in either source fact, so inspect the complete relationship.
Calculated-field findings
Explain a mismatch or missing dependency in a product calculation. Correct the inputs rather than the displayed calculated output.
Taxonomy or formula findings
Come from rules implemented for the pinned taxonomy package. Read the rule identity and disclosed coverage; not every source formula is necessarily executable in the current product.
Jurisdiction findings
Apply only to the selected authority profile and implemented national forms or validations. Profile-specific evidence and readiness requirements can also block export.
Severity and disposition
Severity communicates product classification, not an automatic legal conclusion. Follow organization policy for correction, evidence, escalation, and review. A finding should never be hidden merely to reach approval.